Login Register

HS2 plans show Devon is still the poor relation for rail investment, says Exeter MP Ben Bradshaw

By GRichardson  |  Posted: January 29, 2013

Ben Bradshaw

Comments (5)

A flagship £33 billion north-south high-speed rail scheme will bring no benefits to Exeter or the rest of the region, it has been warned.

Plans to extend the HS2 line to the North of England have reignited concerns that the city and wider South West will be side-lined economically and lose out on vital transport investment.

Critics argue for just a fraction of the cost of the high-speed project, significant improvements could be made to rail links to and from the region.

The resilience of the mainline was recently highlighted after it was flooded causing severe disruption, and leaving the peninsula effectively cut-off.

So-called 'connectivity' has long been seen as the biggest issue facing the region.

Exeter is already to miss out on a massive expansion of track electrification up to the end of the decade, which promises to bring faster, more reliable train services where it is being introduced.

Rail spending per head in the South West is just a third of that in the rest of the country.

The Manchester and Leeds extensions to HS2 northwards from Birmingham are designed to cut journey times, ease overcrowding and boost regional business. Officials say the £32.7 billion project will create at least 100,000 jobs.

The first phase of the project will be completed in 2026, and includes an interchange station at Old Oak Common in West London, providing a connection to the South West via the Great Western main line.

But a proposed spur to Heathrow has been put on hold pending the results of Sir Howard Davies' review of future airport capacity - which is not due to give a final report until the summer of 2015.

The Government argues the project will close the north-south divide, however research has previously indicated that Devon and the wider region is threatened with having fewer jobs, poorer workers, and lower economic growth as a result.

Speaking as the latest high-speed routes were announced Lib Dem MP Adrian Sanders, who sits on the Commons Transport Select committee said: "There's no benefit at all to the far South West.

"We have the slowest speeds and the highest fares and all the new investment is going to go elsewhere.

"For a fraction of the £33 billion being invested we could do an enormous amount improving our rolling stock, increasing the capacity both on the trains and on the track, getting rid of congestion points, speeding up journey times, improving punctuality and bringing down fares.

"The idea we are going to get people's hand-me-downs as a result of upgrades elsewhere, that's not good enough when you are starting off with the worst links to begin with."

Labour's Exeter MP Ben Bradshaw said: "I welcome investment in rail, but once again the Westcountry is the poor relation when it comes to rail improvements.

"We have pressing work needed now, like at Cowley Bridge in Exeter, electrification and upgrading the Waterloo line that would create much needed jobs now and boost our economy much sooner than HS2."

Read more from Exeter Express and Echo

Do you have something to say? Leave your comment here...

max 4000 characters


  • Juan11_1  |  January 29 2013, 8:26PM

    HS2 was established by the Labour government in 2009 to examine the case for a new line from London to the West Midlands. I have looked through the House of Commons record for the period 2008/09 and 2009/10 but can find no comment on this subject from Mr Bradsaw. In November 2010 he spoke about was the 'electrification of the great western line' - which had been announced by Labour in 2009. This was shortly before Labour lost the general election and announced there was no money left to pay for it.

    |   1
  • dee1111  |  January 29 2013, 3:48PM

    What a cheek for Ben Bradshaw to complain about the S.West being left out again. Labour were in power for 13 years and how much did they do to improve things down here?

    |   8
  • APExeter  |  January 29 2013, 1:39PM

    Cornwall is more deprived than most of the North and the rail infrastructre is stone age there- it takes 2 1/2 hours to get from Truro to Exeter by train (v 1 1/2 by car), rail is not a viable option for the Cornish (in particular for businesses in Truro and people using London airports) to get to London- many who do use it have to drive to Exeter and catch from here. The floods show a desperate need for this in the SW- at the very least I would expect a high speed link from London to Bristol to be viable and a worthhile investment? But given the approved one isn't set for completion until 2026 I think we can safely assume this won't be something that will happen here in our lifetime....

    |   5
  • waynejkc69  |  January 29 2013, 1:12PM

    We need a rail that runs through the heart of the South West to get heavy transport off roads and opens up commuter travels. Rail should be used as a transport artery with branch lines from it to the north and south. This is the future really. But I guess another 100 years of road congestion and pollution is what keeps the number 1asset of central Government, local authorities, the Environment Agency and the BBC alive i.e. British Petroleum. Why would good planning want to get in the way of making money for their pension funds? And if you don't believe me have a look at the top ten assets of all of the above. BP is always number 1. Until this is looked at no sustainable development project will get the go ahead.

    |   1
  • MrVanKleefe  |  January 29 2013, 9:53AM

    Not enough Tory voters down here to be listened to. Clegg isn't going to ask Cameron for any help. As a matter of safety we need improvements.

    |   4